Print | Send To Friends | Add To Favorites | Comment

The Cloning Debate

By: Peter Kennedy

Article Word Count: 529 words  [Comments (0)]
Total Views: 1 Views



Cloning is the process of creating an exact copy of the original, and recently, “cloning” refers to the replication of living humans and animals. Somatic cell nuclear transfer, as the process is called, involves removing the nucleus from an egg cell and replacing it with the nucleus from a cell of the organism to be cloned. In the past few years, advances have been made in both human and animal cloning. Scottish scientists famously cloned a sheep, and British scientists reportedly cloned a human embryo that survived for five days. Cloning is an extremely controversial subject that forces society to examine the proper limits of man’s control over life.

In 1997, Scottish scientists famously produced a female sheep, “Dolly,” using the process of reproductive cloning. Since that time, other scientists have cloned other species, including cows and rabbits. Most recently, scientists are attempting to reproduce humans through cloning. President Bush and the Republican party are strongly in opposition to human cloning. Conservatively tend to believe that life is a creation, “not a commodity,” and that human cloning would have a disastrous impact on the American moral fabric. In 2002, Congress introduced a bill that would ban human cloning in all forms, imposing a prison sentence and multi-million dollar fine on anyone who attempted human cloning. (The Ban on Human Cloning Act has yet to be passed.)

There are practical considerations to the cloning debate, as well. Most medical experts believe that reproductive human cloning would not produce a health newborn. Indeed, many scientists predict that cloning would produce harmful abnormalities in a baby’s genes. Many scientists and medical practitioners welcome the advance of cloning for individual human cells. This process, called therapeutic cloning, adopts the concept of cloning on a micro scale, to help regenerate broken or diseased body parts. Some politicians, such as Republican Senator Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania, support the idea of therapeutic cloning.

Critics of therapeutic cloning argue that the process should be prohibited, no matter how beneficial the practical applications may turn out to be. The most vocal critics of therapeutic cloning, mainly from religious communities, argue that the destruction of human life, even on cellular level, is a moral offense. These cells form the beginning of human life, and humans do not have the right to destroy life in order to create life. The creation of life, they argue, should be left to God.

The cloning debate lends itself to larger questions, including: Is it immoral to recreate life artificially? Does human life really begin at the cellular level? Should the government interfere with scientific advances that could benefit millions of people?




About the author:


OpineTree is a blog website that encourages debate on today’s most controversial political topics, including abortion, affirmative action, http://www.opinetree.com/cloning.html">cloning, the death penalty, euthanasia, gay marriage, gun control, health care, social security, stem cells, as well as other http://www.opinetree.com”>debate topics. Visit http://www.opinetree.com/cloning.htmlto join the http://www.opinetree.com/cloning.html">cloning debate.





Print | Send To Friends | Add To Favorites | Comment

Related articles


How To Appeal Your Denied Social Security Claims? By: Jinky - Social Security is an agency of rules and regulations.
 
Social Security MemberÂ’s Concerns By: Jinky - Changing of Names The Social Security has set some rules and regulations to be followed by members who wish to have their names changed.
 
Tips on Selecting the Right Personal Injury or Car Accident Lawyer By: smgenie - If you are in a car accident and suffer an injury, you should consult with an attorney.
 
What does it take to be a Lawyer? By: Amit - When you see all these handsome Lawyers in TV series like LA Law, sitting in their fancy offices, driving these flashy cars, have you ever realized what they have been through in terms of time, years of education, money, Certifications etcÂ’.
 
Understanding Tort By: David C Skul - Tort law is different from the laws of contract, restitution, and the criminal law.
 
The Insanity of the Defense By: Sam Vaknin - I.
 
Money Laundering in A Changed World By: Sam Vaknin - If you shop with a major bank, chances are that all the transactions in your account are scrutinized by AML (Anti Money Laundering) software.
 
Corruption and Transparency By: Sam Vaknin - I.
 
Employment Law: Sex Discrimination - Justification - Margin of Discretion By: Dr Rosanna Cooper - In the case of Hardys and Hansons plc v Lax [2005] EWCA Civ 846 (Court of Appeal), the appellant employers were brewers who ran a chain of public houses.
 
Employment Law: Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal - 'Last Straw' By: Dr Rosanna Cooper - The case of Bell v The Spirit Group Ltd [2005] concerned a claim for unfair and constructive dismissal.
 
Employment Law - Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal By: Dr Rosanna Cooper - The case of Thornley v Land Securities Trillium Ltd [2005] concerned a claim for unfair and constructive dismissal by an employee who alleged that her employer imposed a new job description on her and she contended that her contract of employment was fundamentally breached by such changes to her duties imposed by her employer.
 
Employment Law: Attendance Rewards - Legal Ramifications By: Dr Rosanna Cooper - If you were thinking of offering your employees special rewards as incentives for having good attendance records, then you must read on.
 
Employment Law: Unfair Dismissal - Employer Succeeded in Changing Terms of Employment By: Dr Rosanna Cooper - Good News for Employers wishing to change the terms of employment of employees, however, employers must still take care.
 
Employment Law: Time Limits for Bringing Employment Tribunal Claims By: Dr Rosanna Cooper - In the case of Chouafi v London United Busways Ltd [2005], the claimant was employed as a bus driver by the defendant company.
 
Employment Law - Claims - Overseas Worker By: Dr Rosanna Cooper - In the case Saggar v Ministry of Defence [2005] , it was held that an overseas based employee of a British business, who was a UK resident when recruited or at any time during the course of the employee's employment, is entitled to bring a discrimination claim in the UK .
 

Search the Articles


Subscribe

Receive alert message from us when new articles submitted to our site for free.

Enter your name

Enter your email

Categories

Syndicates